President Trump’s announcement of tariffs on imported steel and aluminum represents just the latest skirmish in a U.S. trade agenda that is heading in a more protectionist direction. The tangible economic impact is hard to judge: The tariffs will damage U.S. potential growth at the margin, without having a significant impact on its trade deficit with the rest of the world.
But the symbolism is arresting. The decision by the other 11 signatories to the Trans-Pacific Partnership agreement to press on without the U.S. - and without some of the clauses the U.S. had included to safeguard U.S. interests - symbolizes how global trade policy leadership has changed.
It’s the symbolism that really accounts for the market reaction. Over the past 12 months, total iron and steel imports made up only 1.6% of total U.S. goods imports and around 0.2% of gross domestic product. However, the fallout elsewhere in the world could be more severe. For example, Germany’s DAX Index was down 2.3% in the immediate aftermath of the announcement, and some listed foreign steel producing companies were down more than 5%.
A trade war is still only a small risk, but it has become a bit more likely.
What does Trump’s latest protectionist act mean for the future? Up until now markets have been fairly unresponsive to U.S. trade policy news and actions, so we might be seeing markets effectively catching up with reality. More importantly, equities may now be factoring in a greater chance of further trade measures being enacted and the likely responses from other countries. A trade war is still only a small risk, but it has become a bit more likely following Trump’s announcement.
The bigger concern over the long term is rising tensions between the U.S. and China. Both countries have already engaged in tit-for-tat tariffs and trade investigations. So far the interventions have been targeted, but the chances of them escalating have certainly risen. Not all of the Trump administration’s actions have been out of step with those of Bush and Obama. But the self-initiated World Trade Organization cases, the blocked deal between AT&T and Huawei, the section 301 investigations into Chinese trade practices, and higher barriers to Chinese foreign direct investment are serious.
This is compounded by the U.S. president’s general approach to China, which is different to his predecessor. He’s rebuffed Chinese efforts to avoid tensions, including offers of market opening and increased imports, and has declared China a “threat,” guilty of economic aggression. Trump’s latest trade agenda signals his intent to pressure China. There have been reports that trade hawk Peter Navarro is to be promoted to a more powerful role within the Trump administration. This, coupled with administration statements that it intends to significantly alter the economic relationship with China, point to further barriers to trade and investment between the two countries. None of this is good news for a world whose fortunes revolve around its two largest economies and superpowers.
Foreign securities are more volatile, harder to price and less liquid than U.S. securities. They are subject to different accounting and regulatory standards, and political and economic risks. These risks are enhanced in emerging markets countries.
Indexes are unmanaged and have been provided for comparison purposes only. No fees or expenses are reflected. You cannot invest directly in an index.
Companies mentioned for illustrative purposes only and should not be taken as a recommendation to buy or sell any security. It should not be assumed that recommendations made in the future will be profitable or will equal the performance of the securities in this list.